Dafina.net Le Net des Juifs du Maroc

Bienvenu(e)! Identification Créer un nouveau profil

Recherche avancée


Envoyé par Lison2 
24 mars 2011, 16:22
Here are the first two.

Modifié 1 fois. Dernière modification le 24/03/2011 16:25 par anidavid.
Pièces jointes:
28 mars 2011, 11:03
Dear Members and Friends,

The information below has been verified by a number of my sources. It is the "real deal."

A Facebook page was created calling for a 3rd Intifada on Israel. They are calling for the Arab world to take over Israel. The number of people clicking on the "Like" button is increasing every hour (yesterday they had 125,000 likes, this morning 221,000+ ). We MUST have Facebook take action and remove this page. Please click on the link below and scroll down the left side of the page where you will see (under where it shows how many people like it) a "Report Page" link. Select that option and choose "Contains hate speech".
If you don't have a Facebook account, you should still forward this to others.
Thank you !
The Board of Second Generation
28 mars 2011, 14:45

Israel Beiteinu's Citizenship Bill passes into law

03/28/2011 22:17

An Israel Beiteinu bill derided by critics as unfairly targeting Israeli Arabs passed into law late Monday night, and was welcomed by supporters as strengthening internal deterrence against would-be terrorists and traitors. The Citizenship Law enables courts to revoke citizenship, in addition to issuing prison sentences, against people who are convicted of treason, serious treason, aiding the enemy in a time of war, or having committed terror against the state.
10 avril 2011, 15:25
Les républicains sont stupides. Ca on le savait.... Mais là on attend le plus bas!


"Ne nous y trompons pas : ceux qui parlent de l'islamisation de la France sont guidés par la même obsession xénophobe que ceux qui dénonçaient la judaïsation de notre pays dans les années 1930. L'étranger, quel que soit son visage, reste responsable pour l'extrême droite des maux de notre -société." Richard Prasquier, Président du CRIF
18 avril 2011, 12:10
quelle ordure cet imam!!!

01 mai 2011, 06:49

This was written by a woman born in Egypt as a Muslim.
This is not hearsay, and it will scare you. Make sure you read the paragraph (in red) towards the end.
This is your chance to make a difference!!!


Joys of Muslim Women
by Nonie Darwish

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child,
consummating the marriage by 9.

The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the
private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.

Even though a woman is abused, she can not obtain a divorce.

To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.

Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry.

The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family.

Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and the man does not have to say why he has beaten her.

The husband is permitted to have 4 wives and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.

The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

In the Western World ( America ) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain
a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters
and daughters attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and
their children unsuspectingly to theShariah law.

By passing this on, enlightened American women may avoid becoming a slave under Shariah Law.

Ripping the West in Two. Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah
law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law.

Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before immigrating to America in 1978, when
she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel . He was a high-ranking Egyptian
military officer stationed with his family in Gaza .

When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family
an elevated position in Muslim society.

But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing.
She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping sharia law - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in
Islamic countries.

For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization
will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual.
Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.

Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle
East and eventually in the world.

While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems
of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Sharia
encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others.

While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with
God, Sharia advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.

It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being
Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West,
such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.

While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are
being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere.

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. to elect the President by themselves! Rest assured they
will do so... You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the USA .. Dearborn Mich. is one... and there are

I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely
publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful.. some may be
but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam.. the peaceful support the warriors with their
finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion.

While America is getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims
are planning a great jihad on America ..
01 mai 2011, 11:27
C'est savoureux ! et devant Donald Trump... !

"Ne nous y trompons pas : ceux qui parlent de l'islamisation de la France sont guidés par la même obsession xénophobe que ceux qui dénonçaient la judaïsation de notre pays dans les années 1930. L'étranger, quel que soit son visage, reste responsable pour l'extrême droite des maux de notre -société." Richard Prasquier, Président du CRIF
01 mai 2011, 12:48
quite a donner des billes a ses detracteurs ici, les cartoons sont destinees a Marilyn Davenport, cette conasse de Californie
26 mai 2011, 22:42
Il est en pleine forme !!

dont blame the Jews for everything - if you do, go see a doctor

14 juin 2011, 06:42


Eh ze Yoffi

La bonne route apres tout !! Moïse merci
15 juillet 2011, 22:25
Le danger de l'Islamo-nazisme decrit par un musulman canadien

15 juillet 2011, 23:20
Gyl, thank you. Tarek Fatah, another name to remember, good man words should be listened to. How many disciples will he reach before it is too late. How cleaver this man is. I am in awe.

17 juillet 2011, 23:21
Another one from Mélanie Phillips,worth to listen,dear Elizabeth

Modifié 1 fois. Dernière modification le 17/07/2011 23:24 par gyl.
18 juillet 2011, 01:20
Gyl, again thank you.

so, now.... there are all these fantastic analysts, I hear them and approuve,

18 juillet 2011, 11:12
j'apprends à peine aujourd'hui en recevant ce mail ce qu'est l'Arabe League.

see for yourself!

si il y a des doutes eh bien................... voici les preuves.

The Arab League at War with Israel

July 18, 2011 | Eli E. Hertz

According to media reports, on July 11, 2011 President Obama invited the other members of the Quartet - Russia, the UN, and the EU - as well as representatives from China and the Arab League,[1] to the White House for a summit on Israel. Israel was not invited, but the Arab League was. It seems that the U.S. Administration is convinced that the Arab League can contribute to the deliberations.

So, who is the Arab League?

It is illuminating to examine the record of the League of Arab States since the founding of the League in 1945, which is hardly a model for peaceful settlement of disputes in the spirit of the United Nations.

Prior to the establishment of the Jewish state, the League took the following steps:[2]
•In December 1945, the Arab League launched a boycott of 'Zionist goods' that continues to this day.[3]
•In June 1946, it established the Higher Arab Committee to "coordinate efforts with regard to Palestine," a radical body that led and coordinated attempts to wipe Israel off the map.[4]
•In December 1946, it rejected the first proposed Palestine partition plans, reaffirming "that Palestine is a part of the Arab motherland."[5]
•In October 1947, prior to the vote on Resolution 181 - the "Partition Plan" - it reasserted the necessity for military preparations along Arab borders to "defending Palestine."[6]
•In February 1948, it approved "a plan for political, military, and economic measures to be taken in response to the Palestine crisis."[7]
•In October 1948, it rejected the UN "Partition Plan" for Palestine adopted by the General Assembly in Resolution 181.[8]

On May 15 1948, as the regular forces of Egypt, Trans-Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and contingents from Saudi Arabia and Yemen invaded Israel to 'restore law and order,' the Arab League issued a lengthy document entitled "Declaration on the Invasion of Palestine." In it, the Arab states drew attention to:

"The injustice implied in this solution [affecting] the right of the people of Palestine to immediate independence ... declared the Arabs' rejection of [Resolution 181]" which the League said "would not be possible to carry it out by peaceful means, and that its forcible imposition would constitute a threat to peace and security in this area" and claimed that the "security and order in Palestine have become disrupted" due to the "aggressive intentions, and the imperialistic designs of the Zionists" and "the Governments of the Arab States, as members of the Arab League, a regional organization ... view the events taking place in Palestine as a threat to peace and security in the area as a whole. ... Therefore, as security in Palestine is a sacred trust in the hands of the Arab States, and in order to put an end to this state of affairs ... the Governments of the Arab States have found themselves compelled to intervene in Palestine." [9]

The Secretary-General of the Arab League, Azzam Pasha, was less diplomatic and far more candid, with no patience for polite or veiled language. At a Cairo press conference on the same day that Israel declared its independence on May 14 1948, Pasha revealed the following statement which was reported the next day in The New York Times. Pasha repeated the Arabs' "intervention to restore law and order"

"This will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades." The League of Arab States continued to oppose peace after Israel's 1948 War of Independence:
•In July 15 1948, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 54 calling on Arab aggression to stop:

"Taking into consideration that the Provisional Government of Israel has indicated its acceptance in principle of a prolongation of the truce in Palestine; that the States members of the Arab League have rejected successive appeals of the United Nations Mediator, and of the Security Council in its resolution 53 (1948) of 7 July 1948, for the prolongation of the truce in Palestine; and that there has consequently developed a renewal of hostilities in Palestine."[10]
•In October 1949, the Arab League declared that negotiation with Israel by any Arab state would be in violation of Article 18 of the Arab League.[11]
•In April 1950, it called for severance of relations with any Arab state which engaged in relations or contacts with Israel and prohibited Member states from negotiating unilateral peace with Israel.[12]
•In March 1979, it suspended Egypt's membership in the League (retroactively) from the date of its signing a peace treaty with Israel.[13]

More recently, in the Beirut Declaration of March 27-28, 2002, adopted at the height of Palestinian suicide attacks in Israel, the Arab League declared:

"We, the kings, presidents, and emirs of the Arab states meeting in the Council of the Arab League Summit in Beirut, capital of Lebanon ... have conducted a thorough assessment of the developments and challenges ... relating to the Arab region and, more specifically, to the occupied Palestinian territory. With great pride, we followed the Palestinian people's intifada and valiant resistance. ... We address a greeting of pride and honour to the Palestinian people's steadfastness and valiant intifada against the Israeli occupation and its destructive war machine. We greet with honour and pride the valiant martyrs of the intifada."[14]

The Arab League, which has systematically opposed and blocked peace efforts for nearly 67 years, and is in a declared state-of-war with Israel, is now deemed by the U.S. State Department an organization that can contribute to peace in the Middle East.

This document uses extensive links via the Internet. If you experience a broken link, please note the 5 digit number (xxxxx) at the end of the URL and use it as a Keyword in the Search Box at www.MEfacts.com.


[2] Listing of the Arab League sessions covering the League sessions between June 4 1945 to November 17 1957 can be found at: [faculty.winthrop.edu]. (11358)
[3] Session: 2, Cairo, Egypt. Resolution 16 (December 16 1945), "The Boycott of Zionist Goods and Products" (Khalil, 2:161) - plans made to establish a committee to enforce the boycott. (11358)
[4] Session 4, Bludan, Syria, Resolution 82 (June 12 1946), "The Higher Arab Executive Committee" (Khalil, 2:162) - Establish the body to coordinate efforts with regard to Palestine. (11358)
[5] Ibid.
[6] Session: 7, Cairo, Egypt, Resolution 181 (October 9 1947), "Defending Palestine" (Khalil, 2:164-65) - Reassertion of the necessity for military preparations along Arab borders. (11358)
[7] 18 Session: 8, Cairo, Egypt, February 1948, Council approved plan for political, military, and economic measures to be taken in response to the Palestine crisis, including withholding petroleum concessions and other possible sanctions against countries aiding the Zionists. (11358)
[8] Session: 9, Cairo, Egypt, October 1948, rejection of partition plan for Palestine. (11358)
[9] For the full text of the Arab League declaration on the invasion of Palestine - 15 May 1948, see Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs at:www.mefacts.com/cache/html/wallruling_/11359.htm. (11359)
[10] UN Security Council S/RES/54 (1948), July 15 1948, at: [domino.un.org]. (10894)
[11] Session: 11, Resolution 250, October 1949, Cairo, Egypt, Declared that any member State negotiating with Israel would be in violation of Article 18 of the Arab League Pact. (11358)
[12] Session: 12, Resolution 312 (April 13 1950) Called for severance of relations with any Arab State, which engaged in relations or cont[14] For excerpts from the text, posted in English translation on the Arab portal al-bab ('Gateway'), see: www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/league/communique02.htm. (11360)

Modifié 1 fois. Dernière modification le 18/07/2011 11:20 par Lison2.
28 juillet 2011, 15:13
03 août 2011, 12:26
On aime aller à Abu Gosh, good humous, et la baklava est super bonne

<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="

&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed
29 octobre 2011, 03:08
Professor's 'Death to Israel' Rant Sparks Controversy at Kent State University

By Todd Starnes

Published October 28, 2011

| FoxNews.com

Kent State University history professor Julio Pino, right, shouted "Death to Israel" at a presentation by Israeli consulate official Ismael Khaldi, seen in this flyer for the event.

A Kent State University professor allegedly with former ties to a jihadist website shouted “Death to Israel” at a public lecture delivered on the Ohio campus by a former Israeli diplomat.

The outburst came during a presentation this week by Ismael Khaldi, a former deputy counsel general at the Israeli consulate in San Francisco. During the question and answer period, KSU history professor Julio Pino launched a series of provocative questions at Khaldi.

At some point, the professor shouted “Death to Israel” and then stormed out of the building. The event was first reported by the KSU student news site KentWired.

KSU president Lester Lefton, who is Jewish, denounced Pino’s outburst, calling it “reprehensible and an embarrassment to our university.”

At the same time, he defended Pino’s free speech rights.

“It may have been professor Pino’s right to do so, but it is my obligation, as the president of this university, to say that I find his words deplorable and his behavior deeply troubling,” his statement read.

Pino, who is originally from Cuba and a convert to Islam, did not return calls for comment.

A Kent State spokesman confirmed the professor was once investigated by federal authorities. The university said they were also aware of allegations that Pino wrote stories for a now-defunct jihadist website.

And according to the Akron Beacon Journal , the professor eulogized an 18-year-old Palestinian suicide bomber in the Daily Kent Stater, the student-run newspaper.

And yet, the tenured history professor still remains employed by the university.

University spokesman Tom Neumann told Fox News that Pino remains employed and has not been removed from the classroom. He declined to say whether an investigation had been launched into his latest outburst, citing privacy issues.

The professor’s outburst has generated criticism and debate across the campus.

“I don’t think it’s appropriate for a professor, an employee of the university, to engage in such hate speech,” student Evan Gildenblatt told the Cleveland Jewish News.

Ken Jacobson, the deputy national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said the university should consider taking disciplinary action.

“This kind of language is inappropriate,” Jacobson told Fox News. “It’s vitriolic, it’s violent – it undermines the sense of safety for Jewish students on campus to have a professor use such outrageous language.”

Jacobson said he was especially concerned about Jewish students who might be students of Pino.

"It’s a real problem,” Jacobson said. “If he’s doing that in his classroom, he shouldn’t be teaching there.”

Newmann said the university has received a number of calls and emails, and the president had been in touch with many of the local Jewish organizations near the university.

“Whether you are a Jewish student or not, we find it very troubling,” he said. “That’s the point we want to get across. Dr. Pino doesn’t speak on behalf of the university, and that’s not the type of behavior we expect.”

But Pino does have some supporters – among faculty members at the public university.

Donald Hassler, a member of Kent State’s Faculty Senate, told Fox News that Pino is a “colleague whom I respect.”

“We believe in freedom of expression and civil discourse,” Hassler said. “And those sometimes come in conflict – as they did in this case.”

Hassler said Pino must have lost control at the lecture.

“It lacked civility,” he said. "It was an example of hate speech. He knows better than to use hate speech. He has definitely strong opinions. He needs to state them in a civil way.”

Ken Bindas, the chair of the KSU history department, told the Cleveland Jewish News that Pino was not attending the program as a professor, but “as a human being.”

“I don’t agree with his comments, but at the same time, I can’t not defend his right to free speech,” he told the newspaper.

Read more: [www.foxnews.com]
29 octobre 2011, 03:10
le visage de la haine gratuite
Pièces jointes:
Kent State Professor Israel.jpg
29 octobre 2011, 03:41
*et oui, le pays de la liberté, Les Etats Unis d'Amérique, me donne froid dans le dos quand il permet par la loi et la Constitution, la liberté de faire des discours et des manifestations haineuse, comme celle de Skokie Illinois. où le parti Nazi a défilé en plein centre de Skokie, (protégé par la police, pour peur que les commerçants juifs de la ville leur tire dessus). .

j'ai lu les commentaires des étudiants de Kent State U, la loi US devrait avoir ce que la France a déjà "Incitation à la Haine raciale" . Ce professeur Pino est titulaire à KSU, il peut dire ce qu'il veut, et garder sa position.

Seuls les utilisateurs enregistrés peuvent poster des messages dans ce forum.

Cliquer ici pour vous connecter


Copyright 2000-2023 - DAFINA - All Rights Reserved